I know Ethan won't read this, and I will thank him tomorrow, but THANK YOU! You saved my life tonight. :)
Anyway, in Matt Townsley's arguement, it seems to me as the reader that he is making statements and stating facts when he has no evidence to support it. This is a major flaw that we have been looking at in IS class regarding global warming, but I feel it applies to this too. As Walter Bouzard refutes, "I was interested to discover that Townsley's views were not informed." So Bouzard goes on to, how do you say, completely bash Townsley's arguement. Overall, I feel Townsley was just trying to get this statement out to the public, and was making what little information he had fit into what he wanted it to say. It just seemed foolish, and not thought out on Townsley's part.
No comments:
Post a Comment